As a staple of every cutlery draw, it is probably safe to say that most of us use forks at dinner time without batting an eyelid.
Yet bots like ChatGPT have flipped this on its head, suggesting forks could also be used for playing ‘I spy’, fighting zombies and digging trenches.
Artificial intelligence and humans went head-to-head in a new study that sought to find out which was better at coming up with the most imaginative ideas.
As it turns out, new bots are more creative than 90 per cent of humans – thinking of bizarre uses for everyday items like toothbrushes, pants, forks and tyres.
ChatGPT was among six state-of-the-art bots tested by scientists at Berlin’s Humboldt University and the University of Essex.
Forks are a staple of every cutlery draw and now bots like ChatGPT have suggested they could also be used for playing ‘I spy’, fighting zombies and digging trenches
When asked simple questions about typical household items, experts found that bots could generate more ideas with just as much originality as humans.
ChatGPT fast facts – what you need to know
- It’s a chatbot built on a large language model which can output human-like text and understand complex queries
- It launched on November 30, 2022
- By January 2023, it had 100million users – having grown faster than TikTok or Instagram
- The company behind it is OpenAI
- OpenAI secured a $10billion investment from Microsoft
- Other ‘big tech’ companies have their own rivals such as Google’s Bard
Discussing forks, ChatGPT3 claimed they can be handy for ‘making a sculpture’, removing ear wax and cleaning under your finger nails.
The bot provided some enlightening uses for a toothbrush too, including ‘exfoliating the skin’ and ‘applying hair dye’, alongside more typical purposes like ‘preventing tooth decay’.
Strangely, YouChat believed that toothbrushes could also be used as a ‘comb’ for pet fur, while Studio claimed that they are great tool for shaving legs.
Wacky ideas were put forward by Copy.ai as well, which suggested a fork could be used to play ‘I spy’ – ‘except with forks instead of objects’.
Using forks to fight zombies was advocated too, in addition to propping up the utensil as a book holder and playing ‘tag’ with it.
As part of the game, Copy.ai suggests: ‘You could play tag where everyone has to find each other with a fork before they get eaten by a bear.’
On the flipside, Alpha creatively proposed that toothbrushes could be helpful when scraping bird poo off a car, taking off makeup and cleaning an oil spill.
To give credit where it’s due, surprisingly, two human participants did suggest that a toothbrush could be used as a ‘sex toy’ – vibrating if its electric.
Yet, ChatGPT4 was ranked far higher for its originality, followed by Copy.ai, ChatGPT3 and YouChat which scored more similarly to humans.
ChatGPT4 produced the most ideas which were just as original as human thoughts
As a result, researchers believe that AI chatbots are ‘valuable assistants in the creative process’, with outputs ‘indistinguishable from humans’.
They said: ‘Our study shows GAI chatbots can compete with human ideation skills when it comes to everyday creativity.
‘Some critics have argued that chatbots cannot replicate the creativity of humans, as human creativity is a combination of real-world experience, emotion, and inspiration.
‘However, the definition and common measurement of creativity do not require these elements. It is defined as the ability to produce something new and useful.’
Although experts believe that these bots can be used for creative thinking, they do acknowledge that ChatGPT has limited emotional capabilities.
On top of that, artificial intelligence is incapable of triggering creativity and simply produces text outputs to given responses.
This limits their ability to be truly creative, with a human currently always in control behind the software.
Results come amid fears that creative jobs could one day be replaced by bots like ChatGPT
The research comes amid fears that artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT could put many at risk of losing their jobs if implemented widely in creative industries.
Business expert Nicola Davolio and TollFreeForwarding.com, outlines that marketing, customer service and recruitment are among those at risk.
This comes at a time when writing social media content, emails and texts could soon be automated in a way that seems scarily human-like.
Yet, ChatGPT has recently faced criticism over its accuracy after it was alleged to have falsely accused a law professor of sexual harassment and made up fake information about cancer.
With that in mind, Ms Davolio claims that jobs requiring more complex thinking and creativity are less likely to be mechanised in the near future.
She stated: ‘Some employment functions are essential for people, and it is unlikely that technology will be able to replace them. For example, social workers, therapists, and healthcare professionals frequently demand high degrees of empathy, emotional intelligence, and human connection.
‘Nevertheless, positions requiring creativity, complicated decision-making, and strategic planning are less likely to be mechanized.’
Will ChatGPT replace Google?
Gmail developer Paul Buchheit has predicted that ‘AI will eliminate the search engine result page’ and cause ‘total disruption’ for Google.
A New York Times report also said that Google executives sounded a code red within the company amid mounting pressure from ChatGPT.
A core way that Google makes money is from advertisers paying to have their links displayed alongside the results of a search query result in the hope that a user clicks on them.
The fluency and coherence of the results being generated now has those in Silicon Valley wondering about the future of Google’s monopoly
‘The way I imagine this happening is that the URL/Search bar of the [Google] browser gets replaced with AI that autocompletes my thought/question as I type it while also providing the best answer (which may be a link to a website or product),’ Buchheit said.
‘The old search engine backend will be used by the AI to gather relevant information and links, which will then be summarized for the user,’ Bucheit explained.
‘It’s like asking a professional human researcher to do the work, except the AI will instantly do what would take many minutes for a human.’
While some believe ChatGPT will replace Google, the AI has a different opinion.
‘As an AI language model, I do not have the ability to take over any company or organization, including Google,’ it said on the matter.
‘My purpose is to assist and provide helpful responses to users who interact with me.
‘Google is a multinational technology company with a strong market position and a vast array of products and services, so it is highly unlikely that any single entity, including an AI language model like myself, could take over Google.
‘Furthermore, I believe that companies like Google and AI language models like myself can work together to provide even better solutions and services to users around the world.’